Skip to main content

The influencing factors of cognitive impairment in elderly individuals in Chengdu city: a cross-sectional study based on AD8

Abstract

Background

With the aging of society, cognitive impairment in elderly people is becoming increasingly common and has caused major public health problems. The screening of cognitive impairment in elderly people and its related influencing factors can aid in the development of relevant intervention and improvement strategies.

Methods

In this study, stratified random cluster sampling was used to conduct a cross-sectional survey of elderly individuals aged 65 years in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, through an electronic questionnaire from November 2022 to November 2023. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to investigate cognitive impairment and its relevant influencing factors.

Results

Among the 16,609 elderly people, 7524 (45.3%) were males and 9085 (54.7%) were females, with an average age of 73.6 ± 6.5 years (age range 65–101 years). The average years of education was 5.9 ± 6.2 years, and the proportion of individuals with cognitive impairment was 13.1%. With increasing age, the risk of cognitive impairment increased significantly. The risk factors for cognitive impairment in elderly individuals included advanced age, hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms, while the protective factors included higher education level, married status, and greater life satisfaction.

Conclusion

Cognitive impairment in elderly individuals in Chengdu is serious. We can intervene in and improve cognitive impairment in elderly people by controlling blood pressure and blood sugar, treating depressive and anxiety symptoms and developing community colleges for elderly people and increasing satisfaction with life.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Cognitive impairment is a common mental health problem in elderly individuals with a high prevalence and may lead to severe disability and death [1,2,3]. A survey conducted in 12 provinces in China revealed that the prevalence of dementia and mild cognitive impairment among elderly individuals over 60 years old is 6% and 15.5%, respectively [1]. A longitudinal study from the city of Porto in Portugal revealed that the prevalence of cognitive impairment was 15.5% among residents aged 65–85 [4]. Hale JM reported that the prevalence of cognitive impairment in women increased from 18.7 to 21.2%, the percentage of males increased from 17.6 to 21.0% (from 1996 to 2014) [5]. A 6-year follow-up cohort from Germany revealed that cognitive impairment without dementia was an independent risk factor for later death, especially in older men [6].

The risk factors for cognitive impairment in elderly individuals include mental and psychological factors, sociodemographic factors, and physical disease factors [7, 8]. Among the mental and psychological factors, anxiety and depression are considered to be important influencing factors. A cohort study from Europe followed for more than 8 years revealed that depressive symptoms in elderly people were significantly correlated with mild cognitive impairment later, and the more severe the depressive symptoms were, the greater the risk of mild cognitive impairment later, especially in elderly women over 70 years old [9]. A cross-sectional study from six low-income and middle-income countries, including China and Russia, revealed that anxiety symptoms were significantly associated with MCI in people over 50 years of age, with sleep problems explaining 41% of the correlation [10]. A study from Capuano AW in Brazil revealed that negative life events in elderly people were significantly correlated with the occurrence of dementia [11].

Scholars worldwide have performed much research on the sociological demographic and physical disease factors related to cognitive impairment in elderly people. With increasing age, the risk of cognitive impairment significantly increases, and a low education level, living alone, a widowed spouse, unhealthy lifestyle, lack of physical exercise, and the apolipoprotein Eε4 allele (APOEε4) are also considered risk factors for cognitive impairment [1, 12, 13]. Yaffe K pooled four prospective cohort studies and found that cardiovascular risk factors (body mass index, fasting blood glucose, systolic blood pressure, and blood lipids) at different periods of life were associated with cognitive decline later in life, and cardiovascular risk factors in early adulthood were most significantly associated with cognitive decline later in life [14]. A cohort study of older adults from Germany revealed that type 2 diabetes was associated with worse cognitive function, especially in the area of working memory [15]. A cohort study conducted by Imahori Y in Sweden revealed that ischemic heart disease was an independent risk factor for dementia and cognitive decline in older adults and that coexisting atrial fibrillation or heart failure did not further increase the risk of dementia and cognitive decline [16]. A 3-year follow-up longitudinal study from Japan revealed that stroke history and advanced age were risk factors for cognitive decline in elderly people, while a higher education level were protective factors [17]. An analysis from the China Longitudinal Study on Health and Retirement showed that the risk factors of cognitive impairment in elderly individuals over 60 years old included being unmarried, having depressive symptoms, drinking, etc [18].

This study further analyzed the prevalence of cognitive impairment and its influencing factors in elderly individuals over 65 years of age in Chengdu through survey data from the National Elderly Psychological Care Action Project and analyzed additional influencing factors, including mental, psychological and physical diseases, through a larger sample size to provide more information and support for the prevention and intervention of cognitive impairment in elderly individuals.

Methods

Research design

This research was based on the National “14th Five-Year” Plan for Healthy Aging-National Elderly Psychological Care Action Project (2022–2025), the Project had researched in 31 provinces in the mainland China, which was leaded by Department of Ageing Health, National Health Commission, executed by Chronic Disease Center, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC). The study investigated the mental health status and needs of the elderly over 65 years old in 31 provinces across the country, aimed to improve the level of mental health services of grass-roots staff and enhance the mental health awareness of the elderly, and improve their mental health status. We only analyzed the prevalence and influencing factors of cognitive impairment in the elderly in Chengdu city in this article.

Characteristics of the reference population

By the end of 2022, Chengdu has a registered population of 15,715,700. Among them, the elderly population (60 years old and above) is 3,242,400, accounting for 20.63% of the total registered population. The registered elderly population aged 70 and above is 1,734,800, accounting for 53.50% of the registered elderly population. In addition, the proportion of the elderly in Chengdu is higher than the average level of the whole Sichuan province, and even higher than the whole country (20.63%VS 20.04%VS19.80%) [19]. The degree of aging in Chengdu is very serious, the dementia-related problems brought by aging will bring huge economic and public health burden to society, so we pay attention to the cognitive function impairment of this group and related influencing factors specially, in order to provide a basis for early prevention and intervention.

Data collection

The survey used a unified electronic questionnaire, which was developed by the National Action Office, with unified filling instructions, and unified training, practice and assessment for the investigators. Only whom had passed the assessment could participate in the field investigation, and the questions on the questionnaire were asked and filled in face-to-face by the investigators. The subjects received two forms of electronic questionnaire survey, the first one was a centralized survey for the elderly who had the ability to move, and the elderly who did not have the ability to move conducted a household survey by the staff. The results of the survey are entered into a specialized data platform by the staff for later analysis and processing.

This study adopts a stratified random cluster sampling method to stratify 20 districts, cities and counties under the jurisdiction of Chengdu from November 2022 to November 2023. Then, a subdistrict office or township (town) in each district, city and county was randomly selected, a corresponding number of communities or villages was selected for investigation, and electronic questionnaires were issued to elderly people who were more than 65 years old at each point position. All senior citizens aged 65 years in the region participated in the survey. If the survey is not completed, the staff member should record the specific reasons, such as inability to speak, inability to understand the questions, or refusal to conduct the survey.

Sample size calculation: The prevalence of cognitive impairment in elderly individuals was 20% to calculate the sample size [1, 18], tolerance error = 0.02, type I error = 0.05, and substitution of the sampling survey formula of PASS software (version 11.0, PASS11. NCSS LLC, Kaysville, UT, USA) to calculate the sample size (n = 1585). An estimated 20% may be missing or uncooperative. The sample size was determined to be 1982. The actual sample 16,609 is larger than the theoretical sample, so the whole sample has a certain representativeness.

Survey tools

The unified electronic questionnaire was developed by the National Action Office, including psychological scale and demographic information. The self-rated Ascertain Dementia 8-item Questionnaire (AD8) has 8 items . To determine whether the content of each item has changed, a score of one point is given for each item with changes, and a score of 0 points indicates no changes or that the participants do not know whether there are changes. A reliability and validity study conducted by Huali Wang in China showed that the threshold score for cognitive impairment was ≥ 2, with a sensitivity of 93.9% and a specificity of 76.0% [20, 21]. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) consists of 9 items and is a self-rating scale. The participants were required to complete a 4-point scale (0–3 points) according to the frequency of symptoms and to focus on evaluating depressive emotions or moods within two weeks. The higher the score was, the greater the degree of depression, and the threshold value of depressive symptoms was ≥ 5. A study by Chao Wang revealed that the PHQ-9 and GDS-15 are both effective tools for depression assessment in middle-aged and elderly people, but the PHQ-9 is shorter and has better internal consistency [22, 23]. The generalized anxiety disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7), which consists of 7 items, is a self-rating scale, assessed according to the number of days in which target symptoms appear in the last 2 weeks, with a total of 4 levels (0–3 points). We divided the threshold value of anxiety symptoms into ≥ 5 [24, 25]. Self-designed questionnaires were used to assess the participants’ age, sex(male/female), years of education, marital status (unmarried, married, divorced, married but separated, widowed), satisfaction with life (not satisfied, middle, satisfied), self-reported medical history (have you ever been diagnosed with any of the following diseases by the hospital (hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, etc.)). (Detail in Appendix)

Informed consent and ethical materials for research

Informed consent

Respondents were informed of the significance, confidentiality and safety of the study through electronic informed consent and signed electronic informed consent forms. After adhering to the principles of equality, voluntariness and cooperation, only those who agreed and signed informed consent were investigated. This study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Chronic Disease Center, China CDC and was conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Statistical analysis

All the data were analyzed using the SPSS 23.0 software package (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). In addition, descriptive analysis was used to analyze sex, age, marital status, satisfaction with one’s current life, hypertension, heart disease, diabetes and other basic diseases in the survey samples. The chi-square test (or t test) was used to preliminarily screen for variables related to cognitive impairment in elderly people. Then, the potential influencing factors of cognitive impairment in elderly people were further analyzed via binary logistic regression. Quantitative data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (x ± s), and qualitative data were expressed as percentages. Two-sided tests were performed, and the significance level was set at 0.05.

Results

Demographic data

In this research, 20,105 questionnaires were distributed, and 16,609 valid questionnaires were collected, data from 3,496 older adults were excluded because they could not cooperate with the survey, refused to participate in the survey, had incomplete data, or had clearly incorrect data, for an effective recovery rate of 82.6%. There were 7524 males (45.3%) and 9085 females (54.7%), with an average age of 73.6 ± 6.5 years (age range 65–101 years). The average duration of education was 5.9 ± 6.2 years. The distribution of marital status, the number and proportion of people suffering from hypertension, heart disease, diabetes and cerebrovascular disease, and the number and proportion of people satisfied with their current life are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic data (number of persons, %/X ± S)

Mental health status of the elderly

The average score of the surveyed elderly individuals was 0.81 ± 1.81 points on the PHQ-9, the proportion of depressive symptoms was 4.0%, the average score on the GAD-7 was 0.31 ± 1.20 points, the proportion of anxiety symptoms was 1.9%, the average score on the AD8 was 0.57 ± 1.31 points, and the proportion of individuals with cognitive impairment was 13.1%. (See Table 2)

Table 2 Mental health status of the elderly subjects (X ± S)

We divided the surveyed elderly individuals into groups of 65–74 years old/75–85 years old/over 85 years old by age, and there was a significant difference in the proportion of individuals with cognitive impairment among the three groups (9.3% vs. 17.1% vs. 28.7%). (See Table 3 for details.)

Table 3 Status of cognitive impairment among different age groups

Related influencing factors of cognitive impairment in elderly people

First, through the chi-square test (or t test), we initially screened the correlations between sex, age, years of education, marital status, whether people suffer from somatic diseases such as hypertension and heart disease, whether they are satisfied with their current life, the PHQ-9 score, the GAD-7 score and whether there is cognitive impairment (p < 0.05 indicates that there is a correlation). We found that the above independent variables were correlated with cognitive impairment, so they were all included in the final binary logistic regression analysis (whether there was cognitive impairment as the dependent variable), and the logistic model obtained was statistically significant, x2 = 2019.142, p < 0.001. The model can correctly classify 87.7% of the subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of the model were 15.1% and 98.7%, respectively. In this study, older age was found to be a risk factor for cognitive impairment in elderly individuals, and the risk of cognitive impairment increased by 5.6% for each additional year of age (OR = 1.056, p < 0.001, 95% CI 1.048–1.064). Having more years of education was a protective factor against cognitive impairment in elderly people, and the risk of cognitive impairment decreased by 8.5% for each additional year of education (OR = 0.915, p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.903–0.928). Married and separated marital status was a protective factor against cognitive impairment in elderly individuals compared with unmarried individuals (OR = 0.555, p = 0.010, 95% CI 0.355–0.869; OR = 0.440, p = 0.044, 95% CI 0.198–0.977). Compared with not being satisfied with one’s current life, being middle-handed or satisfied with one’s current life was a protective factor against cognitive impairment in elderly people (OR = 0.688, p = 0.022, 95% CI = 0.500-0.947; OR = 0.559, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.412–0.757). Among the somatic diseases, hypertension, heart disease, diabetes and cerebrovascular disease were all risk factors for cognitive impairment in elderly individuals (OR = 1.205, p < 0.001, 95% CI 1.086–1.336; OR = 1.293, p = 0.009, 95% CI 1.067–1.567; OR = 1.261, p = 0.001, 95% CI 1.103–1.442; OR = 2.209, p < 0.001, 95% CI 1.684–2.898). Among mental and psychological factors, depressive symptoms were risk factors for cognitive impairment in elderly people, and the risk of cognitive impairment increased by 34.6% for every 1-point increase in the total depression score (OR = 1.346, p < 0.001, 95% CI 1.307–1.387). Anxiety symptoms were a risk factor for cognitive impairment in elderly people, and the risk of cognitive impairment increased by 17.6% for every 1-point increase in the total anxiety score (OR = 1.176, p < 0.001, 95% CI 1.124–1.229). (See Table 4 for details.)

Table 4 Binary logistic regression analysis of factors related to cognitive impairment in elderly people

Discussion

This study revealed that the prevalence of cognitive impairment in elderly individuals over 65 years old in Chengdu was 13.1%. The risk factors for cognitive impairment included older age, hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, depressive symptoms and anxiety symptoms, while the protective factors included higher education level, being married, and being satisfied with their current life. The prevalence of cognitive impairment in elderly people was greater than that in Taiwan [26] and lower than that reported by Wei Bai and Huashuang Chen [27, 28]. Most previous studies suggested that elderly women were more prone to cognitive impairment [4, 29], but no such difference was found in this study. In cerebrovascular disease factor, the risk factor with the largest OR value in our binary logistic regression, the proportion of males was higher than that of females (2.1% vs. 1.9%), and the average age of males was mild older than females (73.74 ± 6.49 VS 73.54 ± 6.46 years old), which might have influenced the effect of gender on cognitive impairment.

Consistent with previous studies, the risk of cognitive impairment increases significantly with age [1]. Previous studies have shown that a lower education level is not only a risk factor for cognitive impairment but also a risk factor for death in Alzheimer’s patients [30, 31]. Similar to the results of this study, a cohort study of elderly people in the United States revealed that divorce and widowhood were risk factors for cognitive impairment and dementia [32], and another study from South Korea also revealed that unmarried and divorced elderly people were more prone to cognitive impairment than married elderly people [33]. Consistent with the results of a large longitudinal study from Korea, better life satisfaction is a protective factor against cognitive impairment in older adults [34].

In terms of mental and psychological factors, consistent with most previous studies, we found that depressive symptoms and anxiety symptoms were both risk factors for cognitive impairment in elderly people [9, 35, 36]. However, a study conducted by Lee ATC in Hong Kong revealed that only subjects with depressive symptoms in both adulthood and old age had a greater risk of dementia, while those with depressive symptoms only in adulthood or old age had no significant correlation with the risk of dementia [37]. Through a 10-year follow-up study, Mirza SS and his colleagues found that different trajectories of depressive symptoms had different correlations with the risk of dementia in elderly people, and only part of the trajectory of depressive symptoms was later associated with an increased risk of dementia [38]. Therefore, well-designed cohort studies are needed in the future to further confirm the correlation between mental and psychological factors such as depressive symptoms and cognitive impairment in elderly people.

In terms of somatic diseases, hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, and cerebrovascular disease were all risk factors for cognitive impairment in elderly individuals. Although many articles have shown a significant correlation between hypertension and cognitive impairment in elderly people [39, 40], a meta-analysis conducted by Hughes D showed that the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in elderly people could be reduced by controlling blood pressure [41], but there were also different results. A cross-sectional survey conducted by Lazo-Porras M in Peru did not find a significant association between hypertension and cognitive impairment in elderly people [42]. Souza-Lima J’s investigation in Chile revealed that a greater risk of cardiovascular disease was associated with a greater risk of cognitive impairment in older adults [43], and a 12-year follow-up cohort study from Sweden revealed that diabetes characterized by poor glycemic control or cardiovascular complications was associated with a greater risk of cognitive impairment in older adults [44]. Consistent with previous research results, we also found that cerebrovascular dysfunction is a risk factor for cognitive impairment in elderly individuals [17, 45].

This study also has certain limitations. First, this was a cross-sectional study, and causality cannot be inferred. Second, the participants in this study were elderly individuals over 65 years old in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, and most of them were Han; therefore, the conclusions cannot be extended to other regions and populations. Third, the cognitive impairment in this study is based on the results of the self-rated AD8 scale of the respondents, which is mainly used for preliminary screening of cognitive impairment, therefore the reliability of the results is limited and can lead to decreased sensitivity meanwhile, and the results are also affected by the cultural level and cognitive function of the respondents. In subsequent studies, more reliable screening tools or clinical diagnosis depended on psychiatrists are needed to retest our results. Fourth, the questionnaire recovery rate in this study was slightly low (82.6%), which may have affected the accuracy of the results.

Despite many limitations, this study also investigated the prevalence of cognitive impairment and related influencing factors in over-65-year-old elderly individuals in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, through a cross-sectional study with a large sample and scientific sampling method and revealed that the risk factors for cognitive impairment in elderly people include older age, hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, and depressive and anxiety symptoms. Protective factors included higher levels of education, being married, and being satisfied with one’s current life. In the future, we can intervene and improve cognitive impairment in elderly people by controlling blood pressure and blood sugar, intervening in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, and carrying out community colleges for elderly people and increasing their satisfaction with life.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due patient’s privacy protection but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Longfei Jia YD, Lan Chu, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and management of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in adults aged 60 years or older in China: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(12):e661–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jun Duan Y-B, Xiang Gao, et al. Association of cognitive impairment and elderly mortality: differences between two cohorts ascertained 6-years apart in China. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):20–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rivan NFM, Suzana Shahar DKAS et al. Cognitive frailty is a robust predictor of falls, injuries, and disability among community-dwelling older adults. BMC Geriatr, 2021. 21(1).

  4. Ricardo Pais LR, Carla Moreira et al. Prevalence and incidence of cognitive impairment in an elder Portuguese population (65–85 years old). BMC Geriatr, 2020. 20(1).

  5. al. H. Trends in the risk of cognitive impairment in the United States, 1996–2014. Epidemiology. 2020;31(5):745–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Perna L, Mons WH. Cognitive impairment, all-cause and cause-specific mortality among non-demented older adults. Age Ageing. 2015;44(3):445–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu LY, Shen LY. Prevalence, risk and protective factors for mild cognitive impairment in a population-based study of Singaporean elderly. J Psychiatr Res. 2022;145:111–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ribeiro FS, Santos dODY. JLF, Changes in prevalence of cognitive impairment and associated risk factors 2000–2015 in São Paulo, Brazil. BMC Geriatr, 2021. 21(1).

  9. Han FF, Wu WH. JJ, Depressive symptoms and cognitive impairment: a 10-year follow-up study from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. Eur Psychiatry, 2021. 64(1).

  10. Smith L, López-Sánchez JL. Anxiety symptoms and mild cognitive impairment among community-dwelling older adults from low- and middle-income countries. J Affect Disord. 2021;291:57–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Capuano AW, Leurgans WR. Neuroticism, negative life events, and dementia in older white and black brazilians. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021;36(6):901–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Angevaare MJ, Bertola VJ. L, Predictors of incident mild cognitive impairment and its course in a Diverse Community-based Population. Neurology, 2022. 98(1).

  13. Jin X, Zhang HW. Y, Association of APOE ε4 genotype and lifestyle with cognitive function among Chinese adults aged 80 years and older: a cross-sectional study. PLoS Med, 2021. 18(6).

  14. Yaffe K, Hoang VE. T, Cardiovascular Risk factors across the Life Course and Cognitive decline. Neurology, 2021. 96(17).

  15. Xie K, Schöttker PL. B, Type 2 diabetes mellitus and cognitive decline in older adults in Germany – results from a population-based cohort. BMC Geriatr, 2022. 22(1).

  16. Imahori Y, Ljungman VD. Association of ischemic heart disease with long-term risk of cognitive decline and dementia: a cohort study. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2023;19(12):5541–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Srithumsuk W, Gondo KM. Y, The importance of stroke as a risk factor of cognitive decline in community dwelling older and oldest peoples: the SONIC study. BMC Geriatr, 2020. 20(1).

  18. Feng Qin ML, Xiong Y et al. Prevalence and associated factors of cognitive impairment among the elderly population: a nationwide cross-sectional study in China. Front Public Health, 2022. 10.

  19. Chengdu Daily Report on the elderly population. Information and the development status of aging undertakings in Chengdu in 2022. 2023 Sep 6; https://www.cdrb.com.cn/epaper/cdrbpc/202309/06/c120132.html

  20. Li T, Wang H, Yang Y, et al. The reliability and validity of Chinese version of AD8. Chin J Intern Med. 2012;51(10):777–80.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Galvin JE, Roe CM, Powlishta KK, et al. The AD8: a brief informant interview to detect dementia. Neurology. 2005;65(4):559–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chao Wang W, Qian C, Liu, et al. Comparison of the reliability and validity between PHQ-9 and GDS-15 in screening depression for middle aged and elderly in some community of Shanghai. J Fudan Univ (Medical Sci Edition). 2014;41(02):168–73.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chen S, Baihua Xu HC, et al. Reliability and validity of the PHQ-9 for screening late‐life depression in Chinese primary care. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;25(11):1127–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lulu Lu HS, Tan L, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with anxiety and depression among community-dwelling older adults in Hunan, China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2023;23(1):1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Helen-Maria Vasiliadis VC, Gontijo-Guerra S, et al. Screening instruments for a population of older adults: the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) and the 7-item generalized anxiety disorder scale (GAD-7). Psychiatry Res. 2015;228(1):89–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lor YM, Tsai TM. LW, The factors associated with cognitive function among community-dwelling older adults in Taiwan. BMC Geriatr, 2023. 23(1).

  27. Bai W, Cai CP. Worldwide prevalence of mild cognitive impairment among community dwellers aged 50 years and older a meta-analysis and systematic review of epidemiology studies. Age Ageing. 2022;51(8):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chen H, Feng YK. Trends in the prevalence of cognitive impairment at old age in China, 2002–2018. Alzheimers Dement. 2024;20(2):1387–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Li R, Singh M. Sex differences in cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Front Neuroendocr. 2014;35(3):385–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xue H, Liu SQ. Risk factors of transition from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease and death: a cohort study. Compr Psychiatr. 2017;78:91–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Arce Rentería M, Felix VJ. G, Illiteracy, dementia risk, and cognitive trajectories among older adults with low education. Neurology, 2019. 93(24).

  32. Liu H, Burgard ZY. Marital status and cognitive impairment in the United States: evidence from the National Health and Aging trends Study. Ann Epidemiol. 2019;38:28–e342.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Nerobkova N, Shin PY. J, Marital transition and cognitive function among older adults: the Korean longitudinal study of aging (2006–2020). BMC Geriatr, 2022. 22(1).

  34. Zhu X, Aschwanden LM. Satisfaction with life and risk of dementia: findings from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging. Journals Gerontology: Ser B. 2022;77(10):1831–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sun L, Qiu LW. Q, Anxiety adds the risk of cognitive progression and is associated with axon/synapse degeneration among cognitively unimpaired older adults. eBioMedicine, 2023. 94.

  36. Yang L, Leng DY. Depression, Depression treatments, and risk of Incident Dementia: a prospective cohort study of 354,313 participants. Biol Psychiatry. 2023;93(9):802–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee ATC, Richards FA. Risk of incident dementia varies with different onset and courses of depression. J Affect Disord. 2021;282:915–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mirza SS, Swanson WF. 10-year trajectories of depressive symptoms and risk of dementia: a population-based study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(7):628–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Santisteban MM, Iadecola C, Carnevale D. Hypertension, neurovascular dysfunction, and cognitive impairment. Hypertension. 2023;80(1):22–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ungvari Z, Tarantini TP. Hypertension-induced cognitive impairment: from pathophysiology to public health. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021;17(10):639–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hughes D, Murphy JC. Association of blood pressure lowering with Incident Dementia or Cognitive Impairment: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2020;323(19):1934–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lazo-Porras M, Moscoso-Porras O-SV. M, Cognitive impairment and hypertension in older adults living in extreme poverty: a cross-sectional study in Peru. BMC Geriatr, 2017. 17(1).

  43. Souza-Lima J, Valdivia-Moral MS. P, Association between cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive impairment in adults aged 60 years or older from Chile: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr, 2023. 23(1).

  44. Dove A, Xu SY. The impact of diabetes on cognitive impairment and its progression to dementia. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2021;17(11):1769–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shen J, Markus TD. Network Efficiency mediates the relationship between vascular burden and cognitive impairment. Stroke. 2020;51(6):1682–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to all the elderly who participated in the survey and all of investigators.

Funding

This study was supported by the MOST 2030 Brain Project (Grant No.2022ZD0208500).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Shoukang Zou conceived and designed the experiments. Yan Li, Yuanjing Li, Qin Fan, Baiwei Ni, Yinxue Huang, Xuan Hong, Ting Sun, Yuan Luo collected the data. Xi Ruan, Yu Wang, Yamei Nie analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. Xi Ruan and Soukang Zou revised the first manuscript. Hongyi Li and Ziqi Wang gave guidance and help to the peer-reviewed revision. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shoukang Zou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Chronic Disease Center, China CDC, which was affiliated with the Chronic Disease Center of China CDC and was conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided informed consent statement for this study.

Consent for publication

The results/data/figures in this manuscript have not been published elsewhere, nor are they under consideration (from you or one of your Contributing Authors) by another publisher. All authors agreed to publish this article in BMC Geriatrics.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruan, X., Li, H., Wang, Z. et al. The influencing factors of cognitive impairment in elderly individuals in Chengdu city: a cross-sectional study based on AD8. BMC Geriatr 25, 19 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12877-024-05661-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12877-024-05661-3

Keywords